question

enya avatar image
enya asked

MPPT 75/50 not reaching desired charge and float voltage levels


Hi, I recently (last week) commissioned new battery banks.

12 x 6v 250Ah AGM Full River (1500 Ah).

Adjusted the MPPT 75/50 from old wet cell to AGM. Moved from Preset (2) Default, to Preset (3) AGM Spiral, as this was the only preset for 14.7v Absorption (which is the Battery Manufacturers specs).

Then manually adjusted float from preset 13.8v to 13.65v (again Manufactures spec) this moved the MPPT into custom programming. There is ample solar power being generated (4 x 327w SUNPOWER PV Panels)

Attached are the VRM portal views for the past few days and a longer-term week view, plus voltage at shunt. I have also attached a diagram of the wiring. I will be moving to DCVV shortly.

Maximum voltage output reported by MPPTs is 14.4v ~ 14.5v (VRM) and Floating at 13.44v (VRM)

Maximum voltage seen at shunt is 14.16v (VRM)

(disregard the voltage max on second BMV, historical from old wet cells and faulty aux high power (160A) alternator.

I understand that the MPPT will default to Absorbtion time interval of 1 hr.

I have measured using MM voltage at output of MPPT to what it reports in Victron Connect. I am seeing a difference of 0.08v higher on VicCon vs MM

I am seeing a 0.05v difference between my MM and the BMV702, VicCon showing higher.

During a period of monitoring on VicCon BMVs showing 12.97v while MPPT showing 13.15v (Delta 0.13)

I can accept that there will be a difference from the output of the MPPTs to that seen by the BMV shunts, but this will be (should be minimal, as I have 70mm' AWG 2/0 gauge cable and total run length 6.48m POS and 6.68m NEG.

While moving to DVCC will align the Voltage and Temp to the MPPT. I am a little concerned why when I have programmed the MPPTs for 14.7v Abs and 13.65 float, that the MPPT don’t get above 14.1v at the battery and float at 13.44v

Thoughts?

ENYA.pdf

Voltage at Shunt.pdf

Absorb 5-2-2020.pdf

Absorb 5-2-02020 week profile.pdf

MPPT ControllersVRM
enya.pdf (212.2 KiB)
voltage-at-shunt.pdf (197.4 KiB)
absorb-5-2-2020.pdf (225.3 KiB)
absorb-5-2-02020-week-profile.pdf (233.3 KiB)
2 |3000
Toggle Comment visibility. Current Visibility: Viewable by all users

Up to 8 attachments (including images) can be used with a maximum of 190.8 MiB each and 286.6 MiB total.

1 Answer
Justin Cook avatar image
Justin Cook answered ·

@Enya, that's a very long run for DC cabling; even using the stated 2/0, the voltage drop (at 50A) to be expected over a ~14m round-trip distance is ~1.53%, and, from what I can tell, your stated values calculate out to a ~1.04% drop - which is really quite good, although somewhat to be expected given that I'm calculating at 12v when the v is really 13-14... taking true v into account, you're basically spot-on to the drop expected over that cable at that distance.

Bottom line: the components themselves appear to be working as should be expected. There are three basic options for countering the voltage drop that you're seeing: 1. Move the SCCs closer to your battery bank, thus decreasing the round-trip distance your existing cables are running and therefore decreasing voltage drop; 2: Increase your cable gauge between the SCCs and the batteries, thus decreasing voltage drop over the round-trip distance that you currently have; or 3: Dial up your voltages at the SCC to account for the voltage drop over the existing cables at the existing round-trip distance.

6 comments
2 |3000
Toggle Comment visibility. Current Visibility: Viewable by all users

Up to 8 attachments (including images) can be used with a maximum of 190.8 MiB each and 286.6 MiB total.

enya avatar image enya commented ·

Hi Justin, Very much appreciate your response and advice here. Wow I thought i had had done a fair job with the replacement cabling. but sounds like I should have upped the gauge somewhat ( more $ ). ( should have seen the mess I inherited. Starboard side was twice as long, half the gauge and not tinned. Port side only a few meters in length causing totally unbalance charge and loading)

Of the 3 options you suggest the first 2 are not viable. The 3rd is likely the best option, with use of DVCC to do the dialing ,rather than a fixed adjustment.

Why would the float not run at the desire lower rate, this would not be caused by voltage drop over the cable length?

Thx Enya.

0 Likes 0 ·
Show more comments