This site is now in read-only archive mode. Please move all discussion, and create a new account at the new Victron Community site.
I just noticed the voltage display via the app in my blue solar is quite off.
It tends to show battery voltage about .2V higher than what I measure right at the terminals of the charger. That is comparable to my worst Chinese charger...
Someone else got similar findings?
It might be related to the recent update?!
You say the battery voltage at battery is .2v higher then what mppt says. But was it the other way, battery was .2v lower?
What wire gauge and one way wire distance do you have? what is your battery voltage?
If you have nominal 12v and .2v off, thats almost 2%. If this is due to wire issue, you might have to 1/2 the AWG to get it within .1%, no?
Imho in 12v system going any less then 2/0 is asking for trouble.
no, this was another user's complaint.
The inaccuracies in my unit were probably due to 5V power supplied.
How are you guys with voltage deviations connecting to the charger? I suspect now it is my non-Victron Prolific TTL device connected to the MPPT's VE.direct port which is supplying power on the 5V side to the blue solar that might be causing the deviation.
O wow, did you test with and without the connection?
so maybe the external voltage influences the internal reference voltage?
Hi Boekel and all,
we have not spend any hardware costs or design time on making that port robust / other-use proof. Its very likely that feeding the port externally, as well as drawing too much power from it, influences the reference voltage.
The VE.Direct port on our devices is designed to be a super low cost port; so we can have it; even on devices where 999 of a 1000 times nobody is going to use the port.
As also written elsewhere (its about using a non-Victron RS485 or VE.Direct USB cable):
*Victron - Using Unsupported Accessories*
Hey all, we can’t stop you from using self-made or self-sourced cables and adapters; and making money on cables and such is not important for us; and I understand the appeal of saving costs; however I’m not happy with it; and recommend heavily against it. Here is why:
(See next comment)
(Continued from previous post)
we cannot make any guarantees about functioning; and in case of issues; don’t ask Victron for help. Not about issues with the cable or meter, but also don’t ask us for help if the system works awkward in whatever other way; for example the complete ESS being unstable. Thats of course not likely to happen; but also not impossible;
For example, I’ve recently spent quite some time on debugging a customer system with VE.Direct USB cables that didn’t work, to in the end found out that they were self made, and and communication didn’t work bi-directional. Only RX worked, TX didn’t and that lead to very weird error messages that required multiple top R&D people, and myself to spend time on it before discovering the root cause. A major waste of time; those people can far better spend there time improving our products or making new ones.
Very frustrating.
(continued on comment 3)
Another example: we’ve tested multiple RS485 cables ourselves; and there are many that don’t work properly; they loose packets now and then. So from the outside it seems to work; to then in reality not work really well.
And now this example ;-); I’ve been worried about voltage accuracy; to in the end find out thats its likely caused by using a non-victron thing on a Victron-port.
So on topic:
if you go connecting non victron things to Victron ports; disconnect it before coming to conclusions or asking for help.
So on conclusion; thanks Joe for bringing up this use of the port; me, nor the software and hw engineering designer had thought of that.
Thanks!
- mvader
I wouldn't even consider making my own ve.direct cables, not worth my time.
But I'm glad @JoeOffgrid found the cause and also posted about it so we can all learn from it.
One of the reasons to always ask for photo's of the installation when people ask for help.
Please remember there were too issues.
First I wondered why time for absorption is so short and started measuring voltages indepentently... This happens to be the case whether or not the TTL device is connected.
Btw. My Chinese charger came with a very handy USB socket or was it even two...?
I used it to recharge my phone often. My suggestion would be to have an USB built into the charger. HW costs less than 20ct I guess!
Still need to verify when I have a chance.
It was a just a question. Wondering what the other people with issues are using to connect...
Hi all. in this (lengthy) thread, two units were reported to be inaccurate in their battery terminal voltage measurement. Both have been investigated; and there are no issues with voltage accuracy.
Joe received a new unit from us; his unit was sent to us; tested found to be Ok.
Dean also reported an issue; this was looked into; and also there is no problem with the unit. It measures just fine; unit is Ok.
For all the details; happy reading!
I’m considering this case closed now. Thanks for your help.
Have a good day, Matthijs
Does the delta fluctuate according to the current going through to the battery?
Hard so say. Now I only have a small flat ponsitioned panel and could not generate more than 2A at ideal conditions yesterday.
Now it is too clowdy.
Both voltage readings fluctuate, but I cannot say for the delta.
No difference that I could measure between Victron terminal and battery! The connection is good.
Yes, I think there is a relation. The bigger the current be bigger the delta.
Due to the bad weather I have very little solar power to play with...
@JoeOffgrid
Victron units are well known at this point for having poor accuracy across the MPPT range.
At this stage, the response from the company seems to be "this is normal, live with it", and the response from much of the forum community is generally to attack people who bring it up too much (just so you're aware).
A friend of mine (@Solvan) recently returned his unit because of poor current accuracy (and other issues), and when testing with his vendor, found their entire stock was subject to varying degrees of error. His posts were subsequently deleted and I believe he has now been banned from posting.
In short - nothing you can do. This is the Victron standard of quality. I live with it and rely on an accurate battery monitor to compensate (at least for that problem).
See also:
https://community.victronenergy.com/questions/7861/innaccurate-and-poor-absorption-on-smartsolar-an-u.html
https://community.victronenergy.com/questions/322/inaccurate-dc-input-current-readings-from-multiplu.html
Hey; that we say that inaccurate voltage measurements are normal is false. And that this is our standard of quality is false as well.
Above two linked posts are about a current measurement. For the mppt current measurement being wrong I’ve asked for units to be returned to us for analysis: we measured lots of units; and have not been able to reproduce it.
But, no units were returned / no-one has let me know the rma-number.
I’ll put my real answer in an answer rather than this comment.
If this is the standard, I'd rather use the the dirt cheap Chinese unit.
It would not charge my lead acit properly like that!
Actually, the charger is going from bulk to float very quickly. I set max absorption to 5h and absorption time is like 5 minutes.
I really hope it is a bug in firmware 5.2. At least I did not notice before I updated.
Regarding short absorption times - that would be the OTHER big MPPT problem. See
this and this and this and this .... nutshell version is that in trying to be 'smart' about how they calculate abs time, they're actually very dumb...and yet lack the ability to be told "Just hold absorb for x minutes or until y amps" which, as you point out, even the cheapest ebay jobs do now.
I've been waiting through several firmware updates with no change. Victron just don't seem to care, they're more focused on making fancy looking web apps and slick LCD displays. I've run my unit at float=absorb, and manually set the voltage down if needed.
Not true either; I’ve replied quite seriously a few weeks ago; and we’re working hard on this internally.
You’re own report has been very valuable in that.
I am about to share the document (and soon also test firmware) on how to improve this with the few interested people here on the forum.
I dont know what happened to make you so negative, but I’m here to change that the other way around. Just give me some time.
Sorry to be negative as well. How many years is the blue solar in production..?
I purchased a premium product because I didn't trust trust the cheap ones. Since I want to charge Lipo soon am I want to rely on a quality charger but I must do the same fixes as with the very cheap chargers I had before.
For now I did exactly as StraightUp did - I set float voltage same as absorption.
And I deliberately set the voltages higher than actual target voltage.
You are now assuming every unit suffers from this, but I've installed quite a few on boat systems and have never seen strange numbers, only when the battery is (almost) fully charged one unit can 'win' from multiple units, but that's no problem as it is in a voltage limited fase of charging then.
An if you go lithium, you'll have a BMS, and the BMS will take over all voltage readings from the system, and specify how many amps can be charged / discharged (and to what voltage).
So if you switch to Lithium, all the issues mentioned don't apply anymore.
You may be right. I only know about my unit and now see several reports about the two issues I raised were already discussed here.
On the other hand - I doubt that the people who praised Victron to me on facebook really checked whether the values shown in the fancy looking app are correct or not.
I don't want to use a BMS in my self built pack.
I find with the good quality cells in my 72V ebike pack balancing manually every 20 full cycles is more than enough. I hear often the BMS is the cause of downtime and I want to be in control myself. ;)
I strongly disagree with not using a BMS, and when you have to balance your pack every 20 cycles, don't use the pack.
There have been enough ebike-pack fires lately, please don't do this.
A lithium battery should stay balanced for a much longer time, and the BMS is your safety net for when things go wrong. (and to balance a little bit at the time after a while)
Many people use without BMS on endlessphere.com without problems.
Anyway, a charge controller should control the charging.
:D
I hope it is not victron telling me their product is not up to the task. Just asking for good voltage accuracy. Current is not even an issue for me.
Hi, just for clarity: most comments here are not from Victron; its from a whole bunch of quite seasoned and experienced enthusiasts. Some working with Victron professionally; others just privately.
In case its Victron staff, you’ll see that mentioned in the user name.
To add my two cents about to use a bms or not: the difference is that a bms can control on individual cell voltage. A charger aka solar charge controller can only work with total pack voltage.
But that doesn’t change the fact that your charger should have a better accuracy than it has now; see my other answer & email. Have a good day/night.
That's the worst argument...but it's up to you, I've given my advice on the BMS.
I wasn't saying the product is good or bad, I just mentioned I didn't have seen the problems as described, but maybe it's just the smaller units affected? (I've never used below 35A units).
A BMS is needed for more than just balancing. The protection against undervoltage is a critical safety feature. In overdischarging, the copper anode in lithium cells is progressively dissolved by the cell chemistry, with the dissolved copper plating unpredictably on recharging. This ultimately leads to internal short circuits, and fire & explosion in extreme cases.
Operating lithium cells in an automated charge & discharge scenario without a BMS is an unacceptable risk, in my opinion. The quality of the cells does not mitigate this risk (although poor quality could increase it).
The ebike controller is configurable to limit discharge current and to cut off at a set voltage.
I am aware of the risks.
But this is just a future plan. At the moment I am still charging lead acit.
@mvader (Victron Energy Staff)
If I'm "negative" it's probably because I, with an increasing number of others, are finding our expensive Victrons, sold as premium products, are riddled with faults, ranging from annoying (inaccurate measurements) to crippling , like failure to hold absorb and, yknow, actually recharge the batteries.
Of course, I wouldn't say I'm 'negative', so much as factual and honest. And I appreciate that you've taken it on board and are now trying to fix it (even though really it should have been sorted before going to market).
Whats ticking me off is every time I see someone else post similar problems, the community response is skeptical & dismissive at best ("I think mine's OK therefore your complaint is invalid"), to aggressive worst. Started with Solvan, then me, now Joe. This is supposed to be an official support channel. My controller annoys me, but this forum has done far more to put me off Victron.
On the bright side there warranty is great and easy to claim if needed.
and this forum is a group of customers putting there thoughts up for others to listen to,
its not always 100% correct but its given with the thought of helping, and its NOT victron staff saying most of the stuff you are talking about. its other members, so Please take that into account, I to am only a member, putting my to bobs worth in here and there.
and its nice to see the victron staff hoping on and helping out and taking in issues.
abate sometimes a bit slowly but if the issues are raised and enough is said, It looks like they are listening. well lets hope so.
Its a great product overall with heaps of features and that means bugs,
So keep the chin up and lets keep supporting a very good product range overall.
@Paul B
You may have missed it, but when the current accuracy and absorption issue was first raised by @Solvan, one of the other admins (not Mvader) was among the first to target him and ultimately shut the discussion down, delete the thread and ban him from further postings.
He put one thread up briefly showing said admin even went so far as to send emails to his personal address (lifted from logon details we assume) to try and get him to dob in the vendor, while keeping the discussion out of the public eye. All of this was quickly swept under the rug.
Hey straight-up,
There is a bit more to it. Solvans initial post could have been handled better; I agree.
The one deleting (part of) the thread was me (see my message its still there).
There was no intention at all to sweep things under a rug. It was just an attempt to fix the issue.
The reason to find the supplier is to get hold of those units and see whats wrong.
Which to date didnt’t happen unfortunately.
But at @all, please there is no need to keep discussing this. Its all more and more words to read for me and answer to; while I’d prefer to spend time on the fixes.
@mvader (Victron Energy Staff)
Last I spoke with solvan he was going to post an update regarding those units. I'll remind him but I think he's more or less had it with this forum and Victron as a whole. The impression I got was he and the vendor had something of a falling out, as the vendor was not happy with him making the testing results public. I dont know what happened re. the units.
I'll leave it there and let solvan add more if he wants.
I have to say a few words to this, because it is unfair. I was involved in the discussion and an onreader of Solvan from the first hour on.
The community did not turn against Solvan because he was attacking "the holy grail", it was because his rude and unfair way of asking questions in a public, community based support platform. He was attacking Victron in general, was very impolite to Guy Stewart, was attacking other community members too, who only wanted to help and raged on and on. He assumed, because of his supposed erroneous unit, that all other chargers and other Victron devices share a measurement error. No one was attacking him personally, everyone wanted to keep the discussion factual and fair.
The discussion with Solvan could also just have been:
S: Hey, my unit is 10% off, is this normal?
C: NO, this is out of tolerance, please return to RMA.
S: OK, so I got a damaged/uncalibrated unit. Bad luck, that's life.
As it came up, that more than just one unit are supposed to be affected, there was no cooperation in finding out, where they came from. Victron (mvader) always wanted to help and find out what went wrong.
I personally own 4 smart solar units (100/20, 100/50, 150/35, 250/60) and none of them is significantly off in current measurements and voltage readings are off about 0.0x, let's say nothing. As repeatedly said, it is a charger and not a measurement device. Those results are great, they all do a superb job. And you can believe me, I have seen and installed a lot more than just those four, so I don't think it was a case of luck. As a big fan of the Victron brand, the way of how the discussions here go, make me sad.
But yes, if you have got an inaccurate and out of tolerance unit, you will have to return it.
No one is error free, but sometimes you have to be a little bit polite, to be taken seriously.
Best Regards,
Markus
I hear you man.
But so far Victrons response to MY issue raised here is more than appropriate!
If I had the feeling of sensorship taking place + frustration due to seeing no improvement over a long time etc. I probably would be at least as negative as you are.
That a community turns against a person challenging their holy grail ... man, I saw that a few times ... NOT related to this forum. It's human, although I too don't like that.
Maybe due to the history of the issue Victron agreed to check my unit (within less than 24h on a Saturday ... ). I think that is good customer service.
Hi @JoeOffgrid, 0.2V deviation is indeed too much. I’ll contact you from the helpdesk email to resolve it further / ask for serial number details etcetera.
I hope the following might help some users. Firstly thanks to the Victron team for their assistance here its been very helpful. Secondly I'd like to point out that the conclusion I've reached regarding voltage accuracy has all been tested on cloudy days and I want to confirm my findings on a sunny day.
My belief (like others) that the Victron MPPT 100/50 controller over stated the battery voltage was due to measuring the voltage at the battery and finding it lower than what the controller was reporting.
If anything I was expecting to see a higher voltage at the battery due to any voltage drop, but after testing the voltage at the controller terminal I found this was in fact higher at the controller than the battery.
There are three main aspect of the system worth considering here.
Because the controller is generating a charge the voltage drop as a result of resistance in the BMS drops from the controller to the battery. Hence by testing the voltage at the controller (as the controller software does) you get a higher voltage reading.
Perhaps a more accurate label here would be MPPT Controller output voltage rather than battery voltage.
One way to address this problem would be for the controller to test the voltage directly on the battery (ie bypassing the BMS) and this is exactly what the additional Smart Battery Sense Victron module does if its installed.
Otherwise the work around is to increase the voltage settings in the controller to compensate for the loss. This will still report the wrong "Battery Voltage" but at least the batteries will get fully charge. Obviously this has its dangers especially as the value can change with current (ie V=IR), but measure the actual install resistance (or voltage drop) or with some small incremental tweaking the results are pretty good.
