Yesterday, energy prices plummeted to negative values for a span of 2 hours, reaching as low as -9 euro cents per kWh. During this period, it became economically advantageous to deactivate solar energy production and instead draw power from the grid to charge batteries. However, this course of action was not taken.
Only a minimal amount of energy was sourced from the grid, despite the potential benefits. I observed that my grid load consistently hovered around 0 watts, even when attempting to increase consumption by activating four 3200 W heaters. Surprisingly, this had no effect on the grid load, and the charging of batteries proceeded at a slower pace.
I possess four PV inverters connected via modbus, as well as a Victron PV Charger, all of which remained operational without any disabling.
I'm puzzled as to why I did not experience a maximum load from the grid during this period, which would have been the most financially rewarding option. Simply consuming the energy and receiving payment for it seems like a logical choice?
Dashboard at 14:24
Additional information from this day. Here you can see there was a minimum load from the grid.