question

pyrorider avatar image
pyrorider asked

[Solved] Multiplus is noteven trying to hold grid-setpoint

screenshot-2024-03-27-at-18-57-28-zuhause-vrm-port.png

My battery has enough energy to supply for the load (our oven for baking) but the multiplus isnt even trying to achieve the grid set point of 0W. it only slightly went from inverting 350W to now 450W but not the remaining 2.4kW. It also often stays at +100W from the grid even tough it could easily keep it at 0W. I acknowledged this bug multiple times now, it annoys me because I have to pay for all the power additionally pulled from the grid even tough I already have enough power in the battery. This needs to be fixed soon.

Multiplus-IIgridess grid setpoint not reached
15 comments
2 |3000

Up to 8 attachments (including images) can be used with a maximum of 190.8 MiB each and 286.6 MiB total.

Alexandra avatar image Alexandra ♦ commented ·
@PyroRider

What else are you running program wise? ESS #6 is an interesting one to trigger.

0 Likes 0 ·
pyrorider avatar image pyrorider Alexandra ♦ commented ·
ESS 6 is always on because I've set it to 0 because I do not want the multi to use grid power to charge the batteries.
0 Likes 0 ·
nickdb avatar image nickdb ♦♦ pyrorider commented ·

While in a state like #6 it cannot maintain the setpoint. ESS has to be fully operational.

If you are setting it via dvcc then it will also disable the solar chargers.

Rather set the inverters to invert only via the softswitch.

0 Likes 0 ·
Show more comments
2 Answers
pyrorider avatar image
pyrorider answered ·

I have identified and "solved" the problem, it is either a bug or just shitty written software.

My setup: 1 MP-II 48/5000 with ABB B23 312-100 grid meter

The problem: The multiplus is supposed to compensate all 3 phases to keep the net import/export at ~0W, but completly ignores all loads on L1, leading to all L1 loads constantly being imported from the grid instead of being powered from the battery.

What caused the problem?

As for now, I disabled the "Remote Console -> Settings -> ESS -> Inverter AC output in use" as I currently run the MP-II in grid parallel with nothing but an emergency outlet attached to the output.

With disabling this setting, the sub-setting "Self-consumption from battery" disappears which has two options: "All system loads" and "Only critical loads".

If set to "Only critical loads", the multiplus will only supply the 0 to 25W which are shown on the now enabled "Critical Loads"-Field on L1, but not the other loads on L1.

On "All system loads", it will supply everything from the battery, trying to have the grid im-/export at 0W.


Now the problematic part: If the setting is set to "Only critical loads" and the prior "Inverter AC output in use" setting is then disabled, the system will still handle the L1 loads as set in the now invisible, "disabled" setting, causing the Multiplus to compensate L2 and L3 without any problems, but not taking the L1 loads into account (the self consumption might be compensated, but I can't confirm that as the ABB meter is being refreshed very slowly).

The fact that a disabled setting is still being used in the active system is a problem and needs to be fixed. The MP-II knows how much power the self-consumption + critical loads take, so it could limit the setting to the ACout, not also to the ACin.

2 comments
2 |3000

Up to 8 attachments (including images) can be used with a maximum of 190.8 MiB each and 286.6 MiB total.

hominidae avatar image hominidae commented ·
...so, in more simpler words, you are saying that the setting "all system loads" for "self consumption from battery" is not the default and also not switched back to default, when "critical loads/Inverter output in use" setting is disabled (which hides that entry/setting)


...nice find.

1 Like 1 ·
pyrorider avatar image pyrorider commented ·
0 Likes 0 ·
hominidae avatar image
hominidae answered ·

...in your screenshot above, the Power supplied by the Battery almost equals SUM L2+L3 on grid side.

I wonder, if you either:

- did set ESS to balance the SUM of all pases or each phase individually?

- connected the/your single Multi not on L1?

15 comments
2 |3000

Up to 8 attachments (including images) can be used with a maximum of 190.8 MiB each and 286.6 MiB total.

pyrorider avatar image pyrorider commented ·
The ESS is set to balance all 3 phases as I only have one Multi and that one Multi is defeinitly on L1, I changed my distribution panel wiring for this. I deactivated the charge current limit yesterday, and today even with 500W coming from the pv modules it ignored the L1-Load and only fed the power of L2 and L3 back via L1
0 Likes 0 ·
hominidae avatar image hominidae pyrorider commented ·

what battery are you using? Does it have an external/own BMS and what are the allowed Parameters / Charge/Discharge Amps reported at the time the multi does not deploy the full discharge from the battery?


..also, what value (Power) is set at grid setpoint in ESS at that time?


Edit: make a test...set grid setpoint to -2000W ... what happens?

1 Like 1 ·
pyrorider avatar image pyrorider hominidae commented ·
Battery is a chinese lfp batterywith an extra smartshunt as the bms only reports wrong values (the bms is not connected to my cerbo for data)

The grid setpoint is set to 0 as I am still waiting on my new electricity meter (my current one csnt count fed-in power)

I'll test with the -2kW and tell you soon


0 Likes 0 ·
hominidae avatar image hominidae pyrorider commented ·
without native BMS connected...what Battery Management is configured for monitoring in the GX?

My suspicion is, that the Multi does not know about capacity and max. discharge current of the battery correctly.

0 Likes 0 ·
pyrorider avatar image pyrorider hominidae commented ·
The smartshunt is configured as battery monitor, I was told by multiple people that this is ok to have the bms just handle the cells and have the smartshunt be the "connection" to the system. The battery settings are all done in the smartshunt (including the capacity) and the max. discharge current doesnt seem to be configurable anywhere but on the other hand cant be the problem, my battery is currently at 42% SoC and I've set the gridpoint to -2500W and it easily pulled 3kW from the battery, normal loads on L1 are usually around 100W and >1kW only if I turn on my hair dryer
1 Like 1 ·
pyrorider avatar image pyrorider hominidae commented ·
Gridpoint at -2000W: Only exporting ~1900W to the grid as there is roughly 100W load and self consumption of the multi (so still ignoring the power drawn on L1)
0 Likes 0 ·
hominidae avatar image hominidae pyrorider commented ·
I must say, I am out of my wits here.

In ESS setup, "grid metering" is set to "external meter" and the ABB is configured as "grid" meter as well?

0 Likes 0 ·
pyrorider avatar image pyrorider hominidae commented ·
Yes and yes, I am running out of ideas too. I will take a look in VEconfigure if there is a setting there which might could cause this but I dont really think so.

Its weird, in the Remote Console and VRM Portal you can see that the meter send the values, they get shown everywhere, just not taken into the calculation for the grid setpoint.


0 Likes 0 ·
pyrorider avatar image pyrorider hominidae commented ·
I found the problem, and it is definitly to blame on victron. I will post it as a new answer-tree
0 Likes 0 ·
nickdb avatar image nickdb ♦♦ pyrorider commented ·
set it to individual phases in ESS
0 Likes 0 ·
pyrorider avatar image pyrorider nickdb ♦♦ commented ·
wouldnt that make the Multi only compensate L1 and ignore L2 and L3?
0 Likes 0 ·
pyrorider avatar image pyrorider nickdb ♦♦ commented ·
I tried setting it to individual phases, led exactly to the opposite of my situation, ONLY compensating L1 and ignoring L2 and L3
0 Likes 0 ·
hominidae avatar image hominidae pyrorider commented ·
...what is the exact make/model of the grid meter you are using in ESS?
0 Likes 0 ·
pyrorider avatar image pyrorider hominidae commented ·
Its the ABB B23 312-100 (with RS485 Modbus) and a RS485 to USB from victron
0 Likes 0 ·
hominidae avatar image hominidae pyrorider commented ·
OK, that model should be OK to measure total of all phases correctly.
0 Likes 0 ·

Related Resources