question

Juraj Nikolov avatar image
Juraj Nikolov asked

(parallel) connection of different battery types

Technical question :)

At home I have, unplugged - unused (in good condition) two battery packs (2x 16x280Ah JKBMS from one project),
whose capacity I would like to use in the system that already runs at home from 4x pylontech U3000C (ESS mode, not offgrid).

Would using the following involvement be safe enough? :

1) MP + GX = Master smartshunt (as main battery managment)
2) 1secondary smartshunt + pylontech pack (charge and discharge 148A) + solo raspberryPi Ven-OS (only for monitoring battery healt)
3) 2secondary smartshunt + 15x280A JKMBS (set on BMS charge and discharge 148A) + solo raspberryPi Ven-OS (only for monitoring battery healt)
4) 3secondary smartshunt + 15x280A JKMBS (set on BMS charge and discharge 148A) + solo raspberryPi Ven-OS (only for monitoring battery healt)
5) dva clanky by ostali ako spare, alebo dokupit dalsich 13clankov na dalsi battery pack.

Charging control would be a solution through the voltage of the MPPT regulators and Master SmartShunt, not through the BMS.

In this way, safe balancing between battery storages will be ensured ??
Will it be possible to operate such a connection via ESS?


Thanks for inspiration.

battery charging
2 |3000
Toggle Comment visibility. Current Visibility: Viewable by all users

Up to 8 attachments (including images) can be used with a maximum of 190.8 MiB each and 286.6 MiB total.

1 Answer
Alexandra avatar image
Alexandra answered ·

Pylontec is 15s. Your others are 16s.

Charged voltages are different i would imagine, unless you have programmed/set up the JK bms otherwise?

So on face value not compatible.

One set will either be overcharged (pylon) if you match the vomtage of the 16s.

Or

The other (jk bms) will be undercharged (and maybe not balance again depending on set up).

Otherwise ESS works quite fine with non gx connected dvcc controlling batteries and a bmv. I have quite a few systems in the field running like that.

Balance of storage sort of self manages with a good bus bar current sharing system

So you would have to address the charge voltage difference before continuing.

7 comments
2 |3000
Toggle Comment visibility. Current Visibility: Viewable by all users

Up to 8 attachments (including images) can be used with a maximum of 190.8 MiB each and 286.6 MiB total.

Juraj Nikolov avatar image Juraj Nikolov commented ·

I wrote that I have 2x16 cells, but I also wrote that I would use 2x 15 cells of 280Ah, exactly the number of cells that pylontech has :)

In t, all three batteries should be set to the same voltage of 52.5~53V max. With the fact that 4xU3000C can charge and discharge 148A. I would set the same discharge and charge current of 148A for both JKBMS batteries.


I just want to check my theory if the battery blocks {as a whole 15 cells} (packs) will balance themselves if one block(of 15cells) is initially charged eg. Another 90% to 80% and another to 70%, I assume that they will balance themselves and the current from the accumulator will not exceed 148A, ked to bude mat tak nastavene v BMS. Before I connect it I need to make battery case.


0 Likes 0 ·
Juraj Nikolov avatar image Juraj Nikolov commented ·

@Alexandra

Can I ask ? :)
Why VenusOS ignore settings in ESS and DVCC? This is basically the reason why I want to connect the 2 battery packs to eliminate the problem.

In DVCC, I have set the maximum charging current to 100A ... but it charges more and ignores the 100A limitation, can you advise why? I assume that pylontech's BMS is superior (master) to that setting, and if Pylontech has the option to charge 148A, the system will charge 148A if it has that option...
In ESS, I have set the limit for inverter power to 4000W, VenusOS is ignoring this setting...
I also set the Feed In to 3500W and it simply ignores it, sending 4000-4500W + plus idle consumption of the object until the converter overheats...
Have you encountered something similar?
Thank you |:)

1693821782488.png

0 Likes 0 ·
1693821782488.png (57.4 KiB)
Show more comments