This site is now in read-only archive mode. Please move all discussion, and create a new account at the new Victron Community site.
HI,
I am using the API in order to collect status information about my systems (7 in total).
Currently, "bs" (Battery State of Charge) is empty for all systems.
was something changed?
In addition, when I try to export data from the vrm portal in KWH units(15 minutes) - I get an empty file, while if I try to get the kw data (1 minute) - I get all the data
Is there a fault on the server-side?
Thanks
Hi @nir_fsight,
I can query the `bs` for some installations just fine. Can you link me your VRM installation?
Regarding the kWh export: which export are you referring to and do you download it from VRM or the API?
Hi,
Thank you for the prompt reply.
For example, you can test installation ID is 35484
Attached please find an image with the marking of what is working and what is not.
Thanks.
First the bs issue, I just checked your instance and it reports bs just fine:
curl 'https://vrmapi.victronenergy.com/v2/installations/35484/stats?end=1596462000&interval=hours&start=1596402000&type=custom&attributeCodes[]=bs' \
-H 'Connection: keep-alive' \
-H 'Pragma: no-cache' \
-H 'Cache-Control: no-cache' \
-H 'Accept: application/json, text/plain, */*' \
-H 'X-Authorization: Bearer <token>' \
-H 'Origin: https://vrm.victronenergy.com'
--compressed
{"success":true,"records":{"bs":[[1596402000000,100,100,100],[1596405600000,100,100,100],[1596409200000,100,100,100],[1596412800000,100,100,100],[1596416400000,100,100,100],[1596420000000,100,100,100],[1596423600000,100,100,100],[1596427200000,100,100,100],[1596430800000,100,100,100],[1596434400000,100,100,100],[1596438000000,100,100,100],[1596441600000,100,100,100],[1596445200000,100,100,100],[1596448800000,100,100,100],[1596452400000,100,100,100],[1596456000000,100,100,100],[1596459600000,100,100,100]]},"totals":{"bs":1700}}
Then the kWh download issue. Just downloaded a kWh export of today, which is not empty:
Please note that for those kWh type of data there are certain requirements:
Hi,
I tried to mimic your API request, and I receive an empty response. How is that possible?
HI,
Those two files downloaded this morning at 8:28 local IL time.
https://drive.google.com/drive/folders/1oZkoeN4XlgPL6OBeqtkTTbfawucaW7Qt?usp=sharing
You are correct: the summary file is not empty - it contains one line of data, while the kw info includes more than 500 lines of data. how can it be?
Thanks
nir
Hi,
I am still encountering the issue.
This is my API request (after perform login and receiving a token):
Request:
https://vrmapi.victronenergy.com/v2/installations/35484/stats?type=custom&attributeCodes[]=bs&attributeCodes[]=Gb&attributeCodes[]=Gc&attributeCodes[]=Bc&attributeCodes[]=Bg&attributeCodes[]=Pg&attributeCodes[]=Pc&attributeCodes[]=Pb&start=1483221600&end=1483308000&interval=15mins
Response:
{"success":true,"records":{"bs":false,"Gb":false,"Gc":false,"Bc":false,"Bg":false,"Pg":false,"Pc":false,"Pb":false},"totals":{"bs":false,"Gb":false,"Gc":false,"Bc":false,"Bg":false,"Pg":false,"Pc":false,"Pb":false}}
When I login to VRM portal I am able to see data for installation 35484
What might be the issue?
Thank you
HI Guys,
We need your help.
This is my API request (after perform login and receiving a token):
Request:
https://vrmapi.victronenergy.com/v2/installations/35484/stats?type=custom&attributeCodes[]=bs&attributeCodes[]=Gb&attributeCodes[]=Gc&attributeCodes[]=Bc&attributeCodes[]=Bg&attributeCodes[]=Pg&attributeCodes[]=Pc&attributeCodes[]=Pb&start=1483221600&end=1483308000&interval=15mins
Response:
{"success":true,"records":{"bs":false,"Gb":false,"Gc":false,"Bc":false,"Bg":false,"Pg":false,"Pc":false,"Pb":false},"totals":{"bs":false,"Gb":false,"Gc":false,"Bc":false,"Bg":false,"Pg":false,"Pc":false,"Pb":false}}
When I login to VRM portal I am able to see data for installation 35484
What might be the issue?
Thank you
How was this issue resolved. I just compared the energy reading we download via VRM frontend, and the one we downloaded via the API. The API reports lower reading compared to the VRM frontend. How do I correct this?
