Preliminary design of an ESS system is as follows:
Questions and assumptions:
- ESS documentation states that ESS system will not work with a Fronius Smart Meter, however, I suspect that only relates to when the Fronius inverter is located on AC Out and Cerbo is managing the Fronius inverter as a Micro Grid. Is that correct?
- Fronius inverter is not located on AC Out in this design because Multiplus II is not allowed to be Grid Interactive in Australia. Grid is quite stable so no pressing need for grid fail charging by PV.
- Fronius Smart Meter is used by Fronius inverter to limit export to 5kw. Location of Fronius Smart Meter with respect to ET112/CT in this design should allow that to continue when AC Loads & Battery Charging are less than 1kw. Is that correct?
- There are numerous threads on the ET112 vs CT on this forum and they suggest that:
- CT provides a faster response by Multiplus II to changes in current flow compared to the ET112 although the Cerbo GX manual states the CT is the lowest cost but least accurate option. Is that correct and does that matter in this ESS design?
- There is doubt about the ability to use a CT in a parallel configuration. Is that correct?
- If a single CT in a parallel configuration is not workable, would 2 CT's each connected to the separate Multiplus II be allowed/work?
- CT provides a faster response by Multiplus II to changes in current flow compared to the ET112 although the Cerbo GX manual states the CT is the lowest cost but least accurate option. Is that correct and does that matter in this ESS design?
- In the Datasheet-Energy-Meters-Selection-Guide-EN-.pdf it states:
"in an installation with a single-phase utility connection, that also has a PV Inverter that needs measuring with a energy meter, then you can use two pieces of ET112 or use the ET340."
How would the 3 phase ET340 be wired and configured in the Cerbo GX? - I suspect that the design as drawn above will not recognise the Fronius inverter on AC In (because no comms between it and Cerbo GX) and hence the suggestion to use 2 ET112's. Is that correct? If so, is there another way for the Fronius inverter to be recognised?
Needless to say, there are probably other factors not considered so if you have any input, please respond.